SYSTEMATIZATION OF CRITERIA AND SIGNIFICANT FACTORS FOR EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE OF COMPLEX SYSTEMS TO DISTURBANCES
https://doi.org/10.21683/1729-2646-2014-0-3-108-122
Abstract
The paper presents the analysis of domestic and foreign scientific, methodology and normative documents on methods and criteria for identification of critical subsystems and nodes of important economic objects and research in their behavior in abnormal situations. The authors of the paper have studied approaches to evaluation of exposure of various facilities to anthropogenic disturbances and systemized criteria and factors significant for evaluation of impacts of disturbances and step-by-step action factors.
About the Authors
N. A. Abramova
V.A. Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Doctor of Technical Sciences, Head of Laboratory #51
Russian Federation
Doctor of Technical Sciences, Head of Laboratory #51
D. I. Makarenko
V.A. Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Senior researcher of Laboratory #51
Russian Federation
Senior researcher of Laboratory #51
References
1. Reference Manual to Mitigate Potential Terrorist Attacks Against Buildings (FEMA 426). – Hyattsville, MD: U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2003. – 420 p.
2. National and global security. Terrorism in big city: evaluation of threats and protection/ Ed. V.Z. Zvorykin. – M.: Publishing house “Human rights”, 2002. – 113 p.
3. Solano E. Methods for Assessing Vulnerability of Critical Infrastructure. Institute for Homeland Security Solutions (IHSS), 2010.
4. Baker G. A. vulnerability assessment methodology for critical infrastructure sites. Department of Homeland Security symposium: R&D partnerships in homeland security. – Boston, Massachusetts, 2005. http://works.bepress.com/george_h_baker/2.
5. State and Local Mitigation Planning How-to Guide: Integrating Manmade Hazards into Mitigation Planning (FEMA 386-7). – Hyattsville, MD: U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2003. – 78 p.
6. Willis H., Morral A., Kelly T., Medby J. Estimating Terrorism Risk. – Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2005. – 94 p.
7. Radaev N., Bochkov A. Evaluation of terrorist threat for an object/ BDI (Security. Reliability. Information). – 2008. – № 2. – P. 16-19.
8. DHS Risk Lexicon. – Wash.: U.S. Department of Homeland Security, 2010. – 72 p.
9. A How-To Guide to Mitigate Potential Terrorist Attacks Against Buildings (FEMA 452). – Hyattsville, MD: U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2005. – 248 p.
10. Bea R., Mitroff I., Farber D., et al. A new approach to risk // Risk Management. – 2009. – Vol. 11, 1. – 30-43 рр.
11. Kuvaldin S., Silaev N. Terror with Russian money // Expert. – 2011. – № 4 (738). – P. 17-21.
12. Brooks N. Vulnerability, Risk and Adaptation: A Conceptual Framework. – Norwich: Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment (CSERGE). School of Environmental Sciences. University of East Anglia, 2003. – 20 p.
Review
For citations:
Abramova N.A., Makarenko D.I. SYSTEMATIZATION OF CRITERIA AND SIGNIFICANT FACTORS FOR EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE OF COMPLEX SYSTEMS TO DISTURBANCES. Dependability. 2014;(3):108-122. https://doi.org/10.21683/1729-2646-2014-0-3-108-122
Views:
551
ISSN 1729-2646 (Print)
ISSN 2500-3909 (Online)
ISSN 2500-3909 (Online)
Email this article 