Reliability of information
https://doi.org/10.21683/1729-2646-2025-25-4-38-42
Abstract
Despite the widespread use of information and information modeling, the reliability of information has not yet been thoroughly studied. Aim. The paper suggests a method for analysing the reliability of information as a new type of reliability. A model of information reliability parameters has been defined. Methods. The paper uses methods of categorical qualitative and comparative analysis. Results. The research has defined special features of the reliability of information that distinguish it from other types of reliability. Conclusion. The proposed method of analysing the reliability of information allows improving the quality and reliability of information processes and the reliability of information processing results.
About the Author
V. Ya. Tsvetkov
Russian University of Transport (RUT MIIT)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Viktor Ya. Tsvetkov, Doctor of Engineering, Doctor of Economics, Professor
Moscow
References
1. Weikum G. Towards guaranteed quality and dependability of information services. Datenbanksysteme in Büro, Technik und Wissenschaft: 8. GI–Fachtagung Freiburg im Breisgau, 1-3 März 1999. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 1999. Pp. 379-409.
2. Distefano S., Puliafito A. Information dependability in distributed systems: The dependable distributed storage system. Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering 2014;21(1):3-18.
3. Ceolin D. et al. Assessing trust for determining the reliability of information. In: Situation awareness with systems of systems. Springer New York; 2013. Pp. 209-228.
4. GOST 27.002-2015. Dependability in technics. Terms and definitions. Moscow: Standartinform; 2016. (in Russ.)
5. GOST R 27.102-2021. Dependability in technics. Dependability of item. Terms and definitions; 2021. (in Russ.)
6. GOST 27751-2014. Reliability for constructions and foundations. General principles; Moscow. (in Russ.)
7. Fitzner K. Reliability and validity a quick review. The Diabetes Educator 2007;33(5):775-780.
8. Cohen L., Manion L., Morrison K. Validity and reliability. Research methods in education. Routledge; 2017. Pp. 245-284.
9. Durand V.M., Barlow D.H. Essentials of abnormal psychology. Wadsworth/Thomson Learning; 2003.
10. Gaski J.F. Introducing the Marketing Accountability Standards Board (MASB) and its Common-Language Marketing Dictionary: Background, Description, Vision, and Prospects. Journal of Macromarketing 2021;41(4). Pp. 521-526.
11. Zhu W. Reliability: What type, please! Journal of Sport and Health Science 2013;2(1):62-64.
12. Savnykh V.P., Tsvetkov V.Ya. Cognitive logic’s principles. In: Artificial Intelligence in Intelligent Systems. Proceedings of Computer Science On-line Conference. Сер. “Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems”. Zlín (Czech Republic); 2021. Pp. 288-296.
13. Kudzh S.A., Tsvetkov V.Ya. Cognitive expert assessment. In: Artificial Intelligence in Intelligent Systems. Proceedings of Computer Science On-line Conference. Сер. “Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems”. Zlín (Czech Republic); 2021. Pp. 742-749.
14. Tsvetkov V.Ya. Cognitive Science of Information Retrieval. European Journal of Psychological Studies 2015;1(5):37-44.
15. Davidshofer K.R., Murphy C.O. Psychological testing: principles and applications. Pearson; 2005. P. 624.
16. Berti-Equille L., Borge-Holthoefer J. Veracity of Data. Springer Nature; 2022.
17. Ivannikov A.D., Tikhonov A.N., Tsvetkov V.Ya. Fundamentals of the information theory. Moscow: MAKS Press; 2007.
18. Tsvetkov V.Ya. Information Interaction as a Mechanism of Semantic Gap Elimination. European researcher 2013;4-1(45):782-786.
19. Chekharin E.E. Cognitive modeling as method elimination semantic gap. Education Resourses and Technologies 2016;1(13):103-109. (in Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Tsvetkov V.Ya. Reliability of information. Dependability. 2025;25(4):38-42. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21683/1729-2646-2025-25-4-38-42
Views:
105
ISSN 1729-2646 (Print)
ISSN 2500-3909 (Online)
ISSN 2500-3909 (Online)
Email this article 