sustainНадежностьDependability1729-26462500-3909RAMS Journal Limited liability company10.21683/1729-2646-2025-25-4-38-42sustain-691Research ArticleДИСКУССИЯ ПО ТЕРМИНОЛОГИИ НАДЕЖНОСТИDISCUSSION OF DEPENDABILITY TERMINOLOGYНадежность информацииReliability of informationhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1359-9799ЦветковВ. Я.TsvetkovV. Ya.

Цветков Виктор Яковлевич, доктор технических наук, доктор экономических наук, профессор

Москва

Viktor Ya. Tsvetkov, Doctor of Engineering, Doctor of Economics, Professor

Moscow

cvj2@mail.ruРоссийский университет транспорта (РУТ МИИТ)РоссияRussian University of Transport (RUT MIIT)Russian Federation2025071220252543842Copyright © Цветков В.Я., 20252025Цветков В.Я.Tsvetkov V.Y.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.dependability.ru/jour/article/view/691

Несмотря на широкое применение информации и информационного моделирования, надежность информации пока мало исследована. Цель. Предложен метод анализа надежности информации как нового вида надежности. Построена модель параметров надежности информации. Методы. В статье применяются методы категориального качественного и сравнительного анализа. Результаты. В результате исследования определены специфические характеристики надежности информации, отличающие ее от других видов надежности. Заключение. Предлагаемый подход анализа надежности информации позволяет повысить качество и надежность информационных процессов и повысить надежность результатов информационной обработки.

Despite the widespread use of information and information modeling, the reliability of information has not yet been thoroughly studied. Aim. The paper suggests a method for analysing the reliability of information as a new type of reliability. A model of information reliability parameters has been defined. Methods. The paper uses methods of categorical qualitative and comparative analysis. Results. The research has defined special features of the reliability of information that distinguish it from other types of reliability. Conclusion. The proposed method of analysing the reliability of information allows improving the quality and reliability of information processes and the reliability of information processing results.

надежность информациивалидностьдостоверность информациипроцессуальная надежностьсемантическая надежностьreliability of informationvalidityfidelity of informationprocedural reliabilitysemantic reliabilityReferencesWeikum G. Towards guaranteed quality and dependability of information services // Datenbanksysteme in Büro, Technik und Wissenschaft: 8. GI–Fachtagung Freiburg im Breisgau, 1‑3. März 1999. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1999. Pp. 379-409.Weikum G. Towards guaranteed quality and dependability of information services. Datenbanksysteme in Büro, Technik und Wissenschaft: 8. GI–Fachtagung Freiburg im Breisgau, 1-3 März 1999. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 1999. Pp. 379-409.Distefano S., Puliafito A. Information dependability in distributed systems: The dependable distributed storage system // Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering. 2014. Vol. 21. No. 1. Pp. 3-18.Distefano S., Puliafito A. Information dependability in distributed systems: The dependable distributed storage system. Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering 2014;21(1):3-18.Ceolin D. et al. Assessing trust for determining the reliability of information. In: Situation awareness with systems of systems. Pp. 209-228. Springer New York, 2013.Ceolin D. et al. Assessing trust for determining the reliability of information. In: Situation awareness with systems of systems. Springer New York; 2013. Pp. 209-228.ГОСТ 27.002-2015. Надежность в технике. Термины и определения. М.: Стандартинформ, 2016. IV, 24 с.GOST 27.002-2015. Dependability in technics. Terms and definitions. Moscow: Standartinform; 2016. (in Russ.)ГОСТ Р 27.102-2021. Надежность в технике. М.: Российский институт стандартизации, 2021. IV, 36 с.GOST R 27.102-2021. Dependability in technics. Dependability of item. Terms and definitions; 2021. (in Russ.)ГОСТ 27751-2014. Надежность строительных конструкций. М.: Стандартинформ, 2015. II, 14 с.GOST 27751-2014. Reliability for constructions and foundations. General principles; Moscow. (in Russ.)Fitzner K. Reliability and validity a quick review // The Diabetes Educator. 2007. Vol. 33. No. 5. Pp. 775-780.Fitzner K. Reliability and validity a quick review. The Diabetes Educator 2007;33(5):775-780.Cohen L., Manion L., Morrison K. Validity and reliability // Research methods in education. Routledge, 2017. Pp. 245-284.Cohen L., Manion L., Morrison K. Validity and reliability. Research methods in education. Routledge; 2017. Pp. 245-284.Durand V.M., Barlow D.H. Essentials of abnormal psychology. Wadsworth/Thomson Learning, 2003.Durand V.M., Barlow D.H. Essentials of abnormal psychology. Wadsworth/Thomson Learning; 2003.Gaski J.F. Introducing the Marketing Accountability Standards Board (MASB) and its Common-Language Marketing Dictionary: Background, Description, Vision, and Prospects // Journal of Macromarketing. 2021. Vol. 41. No. 4. Pp. 521-526.Gaski J.F. Introducing the Marketing Accountability Standards Board (MASB) and its Common-Language Marketing Dictionary: Background, Description, Vision, and Prospects. Journal of Macromarketing 2021;41(4). Pp. 521-526.Zhu W. Reliability: What type, please! // Journal of Sport and Health Science. 2013. Vol. 2. No. 1. Pp. 62-64.Zhu W. Reliability: What type, please! Journal of Sport and Health Science 2013;2(1):62-64.Savnykh V.P., Tsvetkov V.Ya. Cognitive logic’s principles. В сб.: Artificial Intelligence in Intelligent Systems. Proceedings of Computer Science On-line Conference. Сер. “Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems”. Zlín, Czech Republic, 2021. С. 288-296.Savnykh V.P., Tsvetkov V.Ya. Cognitive logic’s principles. In: Artificial Intelligence in Intelligent Systems. Proceedings of Computer Science On-line Conference. Сер. “Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems”. Zlín (Czech Republic); 2021. Pp. 288-296.Kudzh S.A., Tsvetkov V.Ya. Cognitive expert assessment // В сб.: Artificial Intelligence in Intelligent Systems. proceedings of Computer Science On-line Conference. Сер. “Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems”. Zlín, Czech Republic, 2021. С. 742-749.Kudzh S.A., Tsvetkov V.Ya. Cognitive expert assessment. In: Artificial Intelligence in Intelligent Systems. Proceedings of Computer Science On-line Conference. Сер. “Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems”. Zlín (Czech Republic); 2021. Pp. 742-749.Tsvetkov V.Ya. Cognitive Science of Information Retrieval // European Journal of Psychological Studies. 2015. Vol. 1(5). Pр. 37-44.Tsvetkov V.Ya. Cognitive Science of Information Retrieval. European Journal of Psychological Studies 2015;1(5):37-44.Davidshofer K.R., Murphy C.O. Psychological testing: principles and applications. Pearson, 2005. P. 624.Davidshofer K.R., Murphy C.O. Psychological testing: principles and applications. Pearson; 2005. P. 624.Berti-Equille L., Borge-Holthoefer J. Veracity of Data. Springer Nature, 2022.Berti-Equille L., Borge-Holthoefer J. Veracity of Data. Springer Nature; 2022.Иванников А.Д., Тихонов А.Н., Цветков В.Я. Основы теории информации. М.: МАКС Пресс, 2007. 356 с.Ivannikov A.D., Tikhonov A.N., Tsvetkov V.Ya. Fundamentals of the information theory. Moscow: MAKS Press; 2007.Tsvetkov V.Ya. Information Interaction as a Mechanism of Semantic Gap Elimination // European researcher. 2013. Vol. 4-1(45). Pp. 782-786.Tsvetkov V.Ya. Information Interaction as a Mechanism of Semantic Gap Elimination. European researcher 2013;4-1(45):782-786.Чехарин Е.Е. Когнитивное моделирование как метод устранения семантического разрыва // Образовательные ресурсы и технологии. 2016. № 1(13). С. 103-109.Chekharin E.E. Cognitive modeling as method elimination semantic gap. Education Resourses and Technologies 2016;1(13):103-109. (in Russ.)

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.