Suggestions for improved dependability-related terminology
https://doi.org/10.21683/1729-2646-2021-21-2-28-30
Abstract
Aim. This article aims to eliminate the shortcomings associated with the application of the conventional, yet insufficiently substantiated terms in the GOST 27.002-2015 interstate standard. Correct understanding and use of terms are of great significance for the activities of dependability experts.
Methods. Shortcomings in terminology are eliminated by clarifying the definitions of the used terms. Several terms used in this standard were submitted to logical and terminological analysis that is based on statutory requirements and the semantic meanings of such terms. The premises were set forth in [8].
Findings and conclusions. Definitions of several new terms, as well as those that do not meet the identified requirements are suggested: “dependability theory”, “dependability estimation”, “dependability calculation”, etc. The expressed considerations could provide the foundation for the adoption of agreed (com[1]promise) solutions.
About the Author
В. Р. Zelentsov
Siberian State University of Telecommunications and Information Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Boris P. Zelentsov, Doctor of Engineering, Professor of the Department of Further Mathematics
Novosibirsk
References
1. GOST 27.002-2015. Dependability in technics. Terms and definitions. Moscow: Standartinform; 2016. (in Russ.)
2. GOST 18322-2016. Maintenance and repair system of engineering. Terms and definitions. Moscow: Standartin form; 2017. (in Russ.)
3. GOST R ISO 3534-1-2019. Statistics – Vocabulary and symbols – Part 1: General statistical terms and terms used in probability. Moscow: Standartinform; 2020. (in Russ.)
4. GOST R 51901.5-2005. Risk management. Guide for application of analysis techniques for dependability. Moscow: Standartinform; 2005. (in Russ.)
5. GOST R 51901.14-2007. Risk management. Reliability block diagram and boolean methods. Moscow: Standartin form; 2008. (in Russ.)
6. GOST R IEC 61165-2019. Dependability in technics. Methods. Moscow: Standartinform; 2019. (in Russ.)
7. Standardization recommendations R 50.1.075-2011. [Development of standards on terms and definitions]. Moscow: Standartinform; 2012. (in Russ.)
8. Zelentsov B.P. Comments on the contents of the dependability terminology standard. Dependability 2021; 1: 34- 37.
9. Zelentsov B.P. Matrix models of functioning of telecommunication equipment. Vestnik SibGUTI 2015; 4; 62-73. (in Russ.)
10. Plotnikov N.I. Development of the technology de pendability automaton (substantiation of standardization regulation). Dependability 2020;4:21-24.
11. Pokhabov Yu.P. Dependability from a designer’s standpoint. Dependability 2020;4:13-20.
Review
For citations:
Zelentsov В.Р. Suggestions for improved dependability-related terminology. Dependability. 2021;21(2):28-30. https://doi.org/10.21683/1729-2646-2021-21-2-28-30
Views:
465
ISSN 1729-2646 (Print)
ISSN 2500-3909 (Online)
ISSN 2500-3909 (Online)
Email this article 