Methodological foundations of benchmarking unique electric power facilities.
https://doi.org/10.21683/1729-2646-2025-25-2-12-18
Abstract
One of the key problems faced by electric power systems is the lack of regulatory documents regarding the operation, maintenance, and repair of the main equipment whose service life is beyond the standard value. Let us call them “oldtech” (OT). The difficulties come down to the lack of a method for quantifying the operational dependability and safety of OTs with subsequent benchmarking. The research-intensive, cumbersome, and time-consuming solution to this problem requires the development of appropriate automated systems. The authors examined certain features of the process for evaluating the integrated measure and benchmarking of unique facilities that do not compare to any others in terms of a specified combination of types of significant features. The recommended methods and algorithms use the technical and economic indicators of PGU-400 power units.
About the Authors
E. M. Farhadzadeh
Azerbaijan Scientific-Research and Design-Prospecting Institute of Energetic
Azerbaijan
Azerbaijan
Elmar M. Farhadzadeh, Doctor of Engineering,
Professor. Chief scientific officer
A. Z. Muradaliyev
Azerbaijan Scientific-Research and Design-Prospecting Institute of Energetic
Azerbaijan
Azerbaijan
Aydin Z. Muradaliyev, Doctor of Engineering,
Associate Professor
U. K. Ashurova
Azerbaijan Scientific-Research and Design-Prospecting Institute of Energetic
Azerbaijan
Azerbaijan
Ulviya K. Ashurova, Postgraduate Student
References
1. Diakov A.F., Isamukhammedov Ya.Sh., Molodyuk B.D. [Problems and ways to improve the dependability of Russia’s UES]. In: Voropay N.I., editor. [Methods of researching the dependability of large power systems. Issue 64. Dependability of power systems: achievements, problems, prospects]. ESI SB RAS; Moscow: 2014. Pp. 8-16. (in Russ.)
2. Aminov R.Z., Shkret A.F., Garievsky M.V. Calculation of service life equivalent of thermal power plant units. Electrical stations 2014;8:16-18. (in Russ.)
3. Rezinsky V.F. [Once again on the redundancy of power equipment]. Safety and Reliability of Power Industry 2009;4:9-13. (in Russ.)
4. [STO 70238424.27.040.007-2009. Steam turbine installations. Organisation of operation and maintenance. Norms and requirements]. Moscow: ORGRES; 2010. (in Russ.)
5. Zaznobina N.I. Assessing environmental situation in a large industrial center from anthropogenic load intensity by means of the generalized desirability function (Case study: Nizhni Novgorod). Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta 2007;2:115-118. (in Russ.)
6. Loseva P. [Counterclockwise. What is aging and how to deal with it]. Moscow: Alpina non-fiction; 2020. (in Russ.)
7. Farhadzadeh E.M., Muradaliyev A.Z., Farzaliyev Yu.Z. et al. [A system for managing the safety and faultlessness of a database]. Energetik 2008;3:33-35. (in Russ.)
8. Farhadzadeh E.M., Muradaliyev A.Z., Farzaliyev Yu.Z. Quality evaluation of the TPP power generating units wear reconditioning. Energetika. Proceedings of CIS higher education institutions and power engineering associations 2016;59(1):14-24. (in Russ.)
9. Farhadzadeh E.M., Muradaliyev A.Z., Farzaliyev Y.Z. et al. Assessment of interrelation of technical and economic indicators of EES objects. Electronic Modeling 2017;6:93-106. (in Russ.)
10. Farhadzadeh E.M., Farzaliyev Yu.Z., Muradaliyev A.Z. [Method and algorithm of ranking boiler plants of block-unit power stations in terms of their dependability and cost effectiveness of operation]. Teploenergetika 2015;10:22-29. (in Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Farhadzadeh E.M., Muradaliyev A.Z., Ashurova U.K. Methodological foundations of benchmarking unique electric power facilities. Dependability. 2025;25(2):12-18. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21683/1729-2646-2025-25-2-12-18
Views:
102
ISSN 1729-2646 (Print)
ISSN 2500-3909 (Online)
ISSN 2500-3909 (Online)
Email this article 