On some cases of quantitative estimation of damage to a technological system
https://doi.org/10.21683/1729-2646-2024-24-4-58-64
Abstract
Aim. The research aims to define and demonstrate additional expertbased methods of examining technological systems in the context of possible damage assessment, that can be used for relative comparison of designed, planned or operated objects of analysis, development of strategies and recommendations for further operation. Method. The paper uses methods of relative analysis of quantitative patterns. Result. The use of additional expert-based methods will allow building know-how to compare technological system designs in the absence of operational experience, to identify their potential capabilities in the context of further modifications and upgrades. Conclusion. The proposed method of relative analysis of quantitative patterns allows developing strategies and recommendations for choosing among competing technological solutions, system management decision-making, and planning production funding based on existing, expertdefined safety and security deficiencies and “weak links” in the technological capabilities or management of a company.
About the Author
D. J. Lobach
Department on Nuclear and Radiation Safety, Ministry of Emergency Situations of the Republic of Belarus
Belarus
Belarus
Dmitry J. Lobach, Candidate of Engineering, retired civil servant,
Minsk.
ResearcherID: HKN7220-2023.
References
1. Safety assessment for facilities and activities. General safety requirements. International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA safety standards series, no. GSR Part 4 (Rev. 1). Vienna; 2016.
2. Safety of nuclear power plants: design. Specific safety requirements. International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA safety standards series, no. SSR-2/1 (Rev. 1). Vienna; 2016.
3. SPESS F Document Preparation Profile (DPP) Version 4 dated 06 October 2022. DS537. Safety demonstration of innovative technology in power reactor designs. International Atomic Energy Agency; 2022. (accessed 21.06.2024). Available at: https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/dpp537.pdf.
4. Bochkov A.V. On the methods of qualitative estimation of the safety state of structurally complex systems. Dependability 2020;20(3):34-46. DOI: 10.21683/17292646-2020-20-3-34-46.
5. Bochkov A.V. On the method of risk synthesis in the safety management of structurally complex systems. Dependability 2020;20(1):57-67. https://doi.org/10.21683/1729-2646-2020-20-1-57-67.
6. Lobach D.J. About development of expert possibilities for consideration of equipment projects and technological decisions. System analysis and applied information science 2023;(2):38-41. DOI: 10.21122/2309-4923-2023-2-38-41. (in Russ.)
7. Lobach D.J. [New problems, methodology, and capabilities of safeometrics]. Promyshlennaya bezopasnost 2023;1:34-36. (in Russ.)
8. Nuclear security culture. Series IAEA nuclear security series, No. 7. Vienna; 2008.
9. Preventive and protective measures against insider threats. Series IAEA nuclear security series, No. 8-G (rev. 1). Vienna; 2020.
10. National nuclear security threat assessment, design basis threats and representative threat statements. Series IAEA nuclear security series, No. 10-G (Rev. 1). Vienna; 2021.
11. Kovalev M.M. Education for the digital economy. Digital Transformation 2018;(1):37-42. (in Russ.)
12. The human factor and the safety of nuclear installations]. In: Proceedings of the International Conference MK-2000. Moscow, Obninsk: ONITS Prognoz; 2001. (in Russ.)
13. Abramova V.N. [Organizational psychology, organizational culture, and safety culture in nuclear energy]. Moscow, Obninsk: IG – SOTSIN; 2009. (in Russ.)
14. Safety culture, Safety series, No.75-INSAG-4, a report by the International Nuclear Safety Advisory Group, IAEA. Vienna; 1991.
15. Examples of safety culture practices, Safety reports series, No.1, IAEA. Vienna; 1997.
16. Key practical issues in strengthening safety culture, Safety series, No. INSAG-15, a report by the International Nuclear Safety Advisory Group, IAEA. Vienna; 2002.
Review
For citations:
Lobach D.J. On some cases of quantitative estimation of damage to a technological system. Dependability. 2024;24(4):58-64. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21683/1729-2646-2024-24-4-58-64
Views:
685
ISSN 1729-2646 (Print)
ISSN 2500-3909 (Online)
ISSN 2500-3909 (Online)
Email this article 