Automated train driving: risk analysis validation
https://doi.org/10.21683/1729-2646-2024-24-1-65-72
Abstract
Aim. The paper is dedicated to describing the validation of risk analysis as part of an automated train control research project. Methods. Validation was performed using several different methods. The obtained results were compared with those obtained from other sources. Additionally, an independent risk analysis was performed using the alternative MEM (minimum endogenous mortality) method. Results. The validation showed that the project’s findings are reliable. Safety Integrity Levels (SIL) 1 or 2 were confirmed for train driver substitution systems. Conclusions. It was shown that various methods should be used for the purpose of risk analysis validation. It must be taken into account that comparable, but not identical results will be obtained.
About the Author
H. Schäbe
TÜV Rheinland InterTraffic
Germany
Germany
Hendrik Schäbe, Dr. rer. nat. habil., Principal Assessor
RAMS
Cologne
References
1. Risikoakzeptanzkriterien für das automatisierte Fahren auf der Schiene (ATO-RISK), Abschlussbericht. Bericht 40 (2023). Projektnummer 2020-19-S-1202. Deutsches Zentrum für Schienenverkehrsforschung, 2023. URL: https://www.dzsf.bund.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DZSF/Veroeffentlichungen/Forschungsberichte/2023/ForBe_40_2023_ATO_Risk.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&%3Bv=3 (дата обращения 29.01.2024).
2. Adebahr F., Schäbe H. The Probability of Human Error and Failure Rates of Technical ATO Systems // Signal & Datacommunication. 2023. № 3. Pp. 21-29.
3. Braband J., Lindner L., Rexin F. Risk analysis for obstacle detection in automated driving // Signal & Datacommunication. 2023. № 3. Pp. 12-20.
4. Schäbe H. Different Approaches for Determination of Tolerable Hazard Rates // ESREL 2001, Torino, Conference Proceedings. 2001. Vol. 1. Pp. 435-442.
5. Dhillon B.S. Human Reliability, Error, and Human Factors in Engineering Maintenance with Reference to Aviation and Power Generation. CRC Press, 2009.
6. Dhillon B.S., Human Reliability, Error, and Human Factors in Power Generation. Springer, 2014.
7. Sicherheitsregelung Fahrzeug – Methode zum Festlegen und Nachweisen sicherheitsbezogener Anforderungen und Bewertung der Risiken im Rahmen der Umsetzung der CSM-RA und der EN 50126, Arbeitskreis APT/SIRF unter dem Lenkungskreis Fahrzeuge, 16.11.2021.
8. Braband J., Schäbe H., vom Hövel R. Вероятность отказа по требованию – почему и как (Probability of Failure on Demand, why and how) // Надежность. 2010. № 2. С. 2-10.
9. Auswertung Unfalldatenbank der Bundesstelle für Eisenbahnunfalluntersuchung (BEU) (01.01.2017 bis 26.04.2021), ausgewertet am 18.05.2021. Voigt, 2021.
10. Hilfeleistungseinsätze im Gleisbereich der DB AG. Deutsche Bahn AG, 2021. URL: https://www.deutschebahn.com/resource/blob/264996/345dad9c6bec2af95dc185d59c94afe1/notfallmanagement_leitfaden_hilfeleistungseinsatz-data.pdf (дата обращения 29.01.2024).
11. DIN VDE V 0831 103:2020-09. Electric signalling systems for railways. Part 103: Identification of safety requirements for technical functions in railway signalling.
12. Veiligheid van de spoorwegen. Jaarverslag Spoorwegveiligheid 2020. Inspectie Leefomgeving en Transport, 2020. URL: https://www.ilent.nl/binaries/ilt/documenten/jaarverslagen/2021/12/10/jaarverslag-spoorveiligheid-2020/Jaarverslag+Spoorwegveiligheid+2020.pdf (дата обращения 29.01.2024).
13. Railway Applications – The Specification and Demonstration of Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS) – Part 2: Systems Approach to Safety-2:2017.
14. Braband J., Schäbe H. Propagation of uncertainty in railway signaling risk analysis. In: Safety and Reliability of Complex Engineered Systems, in: Safety and Reliability of Complex Engineered Systems / Podofillini et al. (Eds). Proc. ESREL 2015, Taylor & Francis Group, London, 2015. Pp. 2623-2626.
15. Braband J. Risikoanalysen in der Eisenbahn-Automatisierung. Eurailpress, 2005. 136 p.
Review
For citations:
Schäbe H. Automated train driving: risk analysis validation. Dependability. 2024;24(1):65-72. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21683/1729-2646-2024-24-1-65-72
Views:
284
ISSN 1729-2646 (Print)
ISSN 2500-3909 (Online)
ISSN 2500-3909 (Online)
Email this article 