Inversion method of consistency measure estimation expert opinions
https://doi.org/10.21683/1729-2646-2023-23-4-15-24
Abstract
Aim. The problem of collective choice is the problem of combining several individual experts’ opinions about the order of preference of objects (alternatives) being compared into a single “group” preference. The complexity of collective choice consists in the requirement of processing the ratings of the compared alternatives set by different experts in their own private scales. The paper presents an original algorithm for processing expert preferences in respect to the problem of collective choice based on the concept of the overall “error” of the experts and measuring their contribution to the collective measure of their consistency. The presented materials include the necessary theoretical part consisting of basic definitions and rules, the definition of the problem and the method itself that is based on the majority rule, but in the group order of objects.
About the Authors
N. N. Zhigirev
KALABI IT
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nikolai N. Zhigirev, Candidate of Engineering, Chief Researcher.
Moscow, tel. +7 (985) 782-47-16
A. V. Bochkov
JSC NIIAS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexander V. Bochkov - Doctor of Engineering, Academic Secretary of the Science and Technology Council.
27, bldg 1 Nizhegorodskaya str., Moscow, 109029
A. V. Kuzminova
Institute for Intelligent Cybernetic Systems NRNU MEPhI
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alla V. Kuzminova - Candidate of Engineering, Senior Lecturer, Department of Computer Systems and Technologies (no. 12), Institute for Intelligent Cybernetic Systems.
31 Kashirskoye sh., Moscow, 115409, tel. +7 (916) 494 08 77
References
1. Kemeny J., Snell J. Mathematical models in the social sciences. Moscow: Sovietskoie radio; 1972.
2. Larichev O.I. [Theory and methods of decision-making and Chronicle of events in magic lands: 2nd edition, revised and enlarged]. Moscow: Logos; 2002. (in Russ.)
3. Kaplinsky A.I., Russman I.B., Umyvakin V.M. [Simulation and algorithmisation of ill-defined problems of best system variants selection]. Voronezh: VSU Publishing; 1991. (in Russ.)
4. Schulze M. The Schulze method of voting. Computer science and game theory. Cornell University; 2018. (accessed 29.09.2023). Available at: https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1804/1804.02973.pdf.
5. Williams M. The Skating system study guide; 2018. (accessed 02.10.2023). Available at: https://dancesport.org.au/scrutineering-tutorial-book-draft-12.3.pdf.
6. Kondratenkov V. [Paradoxes, myths and errors of the Skating system]. Official website of the Moscow Federation of Sport Dance. (accessed 02.10.2023). Available at: http://old.russianmaster.ru/html/skating/skatingparadox.html.
7. Mora X. The Skating system. 2nd edition; 2001. (accessed 29.09.2023). Available at: https://mat.uab.cat/~xmora/escrutini/skating2en.pdf.
8. Lisitsyn D.V. [Methods of regression model construction]. Novosibirsk: NSTU; 2011. (in Russ.)
9. Kim O.J., Mueller C.U., Klekka U.R. et al. Yeniukov I.S., editor. [Factorial, discriminatory, and cluster analysis]. Moscow: Finansy i statistika; 1989.
10. Arrow K.J. Social choice and individual values: 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 1963.
11. Condorcet J. Esquisse d’un tableau historique des progres de l’esprit humain. Moscow: Librokom; 2011.
12. Saaty T. Decision making – the analytic hierarchy and network. Moscow: Radio i sviaz; 1993.
13. Nogin V.D. [A set and the Pareto principle: 2nd edition, corrected and enlarged]. Saint Petersburg: [Publishing and Polygraphic Association of Higher Education Establishments]; 2022. (in Russ.)
14. Pareto V. Manual of political economy. RIOR; 2018.
15. Koch R. The 80/20 principle. Eksmo; 2012.
16. Miller R.M., Plott C.R., Smith V.L. Intertemporal competitive equilibrium: An empirical study of speculation. Economics. Quarterly Journal of Economics 1977;91(4):599624. DOI: 10.2307/1885884.
17. Bochkov A.V., Lesnykh V.V., Zhigirev N.N., Lavrukhin Yu.N. Some methodical aspects of critical infrastructure protection. Safety Science 79;2015:229-242. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.06.008.
18. Zhigirev N., Bochkov A., Kuzmina N. et al. A Novel method for smart expansive systems’ operation risk synthesis. Mathematics 2022;10:427. DOI: 10.3390/math10030427.
19. Knuth D.E. The art of computer programming. Volume 3. Sorting and searching. Moscow: Viliams; 2007.
20. Levitin A.V. [The brute force method: Bubble sorting]. In: [Algorithms. Introduction into development and analysis]. Moscow: Viliams; 2006. (in Russ.)
21. Kaufmann A., Henry-Labodere A. Integer and mixed programming: Theory and applications. Moscow: Mir; 1977.
22. Schrijver A. Theory of linear and integer programming: a monograph in 2 volumes. Moscow: Mir; 1991.
Review
For citations:
Zhigirev N.N., Bochkov A.V., Kuzminova A.V. Inversion method of consistency measure estimation expert opinions. Dependability. 2023;23(4):15-24. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21683/1729-2646-2023-23-4-15-24
Views:
245
ISSN 1729-2646 (Print)
ISSN 2500-3909 (Online)
ISSN 2500-3909 (Online)
Email this article 