Improving the dependability of light vented foundations exposed to vibration load on frost soils

Aim. Today, dynamically-loaded foundations of process equipment often prove to be oversized with significantly overestimated values of stiffness, mass and material consumption. Therefore, reducing the costs and time of construction of gas pipeline facilities, especially on permafrost, is of relevance to PJSC Gazprom. One of the primary ways of solving this problem is installing gas pumping equipment on light vented support structures. The disadvantage of such structures is the low vibration rigidity. A method [1] is proposed for improving the vibration rigidity of a foundation subjected to vibration load. The simulation aims to improve the dependability of light vented foundations by studying vibration displacements of foundations with attached reinforced concrete panels depending on the thermal state of frost soils, parameters of the attached panels and connectors.
Methods. Vibration displacements of a foundation with an attached device were identified using the finite element method and the improved computational model of the foundation – GCU – soil system.
Results. Computational experiments identified the vibration displacements of the foundation in the cold and warm seasons for the following cases of reinforced concrete plates attached to the foundation: symmetrical and non-symmetrical; at different distances; through connectors with different stiffness parameters; with additional weights; frozen to the ground. Conclusions were made based on the results of simulation of vibration displacements of foundations with an attached device in cold and warm seasons.
Conclusion. The presented results of computational experiments aimed at improving the vibration rigidity of light foundations by using method [1] show sufficiently good indicators of reduced vibration displacements of the foundation. Thus, in the case of symmetrical connection of four reinforced concrete panels in summer, the reduction of vibration displacements is 42.4%, while increased stiffness of the connectors, attachment of additional weights and freezing of reinforced concrete panels into the ground will allow reducing the vibration displacements of the foundation up to 2.5 times. However, it should be noted, that applying the findings in the process of development of project documentation and construction of foundations requires R&D activities involving verification and comparison of the obtained results of numerical simulation with a natural experiment.

1. Tyurin M.A., Bocharov M.E., Kleymenov E.A. [A method of improving the dynamic stiffness of a foundation exposed to vibration load and a device for its implementation]. Patent no. 2687211. Russian Federation, IPC E02D 31/08. Applicant and patent holder: OOO Gazprom proektirovanie. 2018137569; claimed 2018.10.25; published 2019.05.07. (in Russ.)

2. Tyurin M.A., Vorontsov M.A. Investigation of foundation dynamics loads associated with the gas compressor units operation. Oil and Gas Technologies 2016;2:45-50. (in Russ.)

3. Tyurin M.A., Kleimenov E.A., Ryabov V.A., Yakovlev D.M., Bocharov M.E. Mathematical modeling of light foundations for gas-compressor units considering soil conditions of the Yamal peninsula and Eastern Siberia. The Scientific Journal of the Russian Gas Society 2016;2:27-32. (in Russ.)

4. Tyurin M.A., Bocharov M.E. [Study of the effect of dynamic loads on light foundations of gas compressor units under adverse geological conditions]. [Proceedings of the virtual science conference of young scientists, experts of the gas industry and educational institutions of the Saratov Oblast New Technologies in the Gas Industry]. Saratov (Russia). 2016. P. 76-79. (in Russ.)

5. Tyurin M.A., Kozlov S.I. [Application of light vented GCU foundations at gas compressor stations under the adverse geological conditions of the Yamal group of fields]. Territorija “NEFTEGAS” 2013;10:62-70. (in Russ.)

6. Popov A.P., Milovanov V.I., Ryabov V.A., Berrezhnoy M.A. Improving the management way of the ground base cryogenic resources for designing foundation works. International Journal Geotechnics 2010:6;4-22. (in Russ.)

7. Attar A., Dandin S. Economical Method of Reducing vibration on Machine Foundation. Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering 2015;11(4):89-97.

8. Van Koten H. Vibrations of machine foundations and surrounding soil. Heron 2012;1:29-54.

9. Ul Alam Uzzal R. Dynamic response of a beam subjected to moving load and moving mass supported by Pasternak foundation. Journal of Shock and Vibration 2012;19(2):205-220.

10. Hassaan G.A. Optimal Design of Machinery Shallow Foundations with Silt Soils. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering 2014;3:11-24.

11. Gazetas G. Analysis of machine foundation vibrations: state of the art. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 1983;2(1):2-42.