Preview

Dependability

Advanced search

PROCESS OF DECISION-MAKING IN DEVELOPMENT OF COMPLEX TECHNICAL SYSTEMS AND THE TASK OF CHOICE OF ALTERNATIVES

https://doi.org/10.21683/1729-2646-2014-0-4-122-138

Abstract

Developing highly competitive products involves making well-grounded and correct decisions which can be ensured by a systemic approach to the creation of new products and advanced decision-making methods. One of the primary concepts of system analysis is the concept of decision-making. The paper considers the primary lifecycle stages of a complex engineering system (CES), the statement of the decision-making problem in respect to CES development and conditions of selection of solution methods as part of alternative solutions analysis. The authors demonstrate the significance of the decision-making process at various stages. From the standpoint of state-of-the-art concepts, the paper provides a detailed description of the decision-making procedure proper that involves seven stages – from the purpose of problem solution to its implementation.

About the Authors

S. S. Semenov
JSC Region State-Owned Research and Manufacturing Enterprise
Russian Federation
Head of the Group for Analysis and Advanced Engineering, PhD Engineering


A. V. Poltavsky
V.A. Trapeznikov Institute of Control Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Senior researcher, Doctor of Engineering


V. V. Maklakov
V.A. Trapeznikov Institute of Control Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Head of laboratory, Doctor of Engineering


References

1. Lindsey P., Norman D. Human Information Processing. Moscow. Mir, 1974. – 550 p.

2. Azgaldov G.G., Raikhman E.P. On Qualimetry. Moscow. Izdatelstvo standartov, 1973. – 172 p.

3. Azgaldov G.G. Theory and Practice of Product Quality Evaluation. Foundations of Qualimetry. Moscow. Ekonomika, 1982. – 256 p.

4. Andrianov Yu.M. Qualimetry of Automotive Products. Leningrad. Mashinostroenie, 1990. – 271 p.

5. Methods of Qualimetry in Engineering / Vladimirov, A.I., Kershenbaum, V.Ya., Polikarpov, M.P. et al.; Edited by Kershenbaum, V.Ya., Khvastunov, R.V.. Moscow. Tekhnoveftegaz, 1999. – 211 p.

6. Fediukin V.K., Durnev V.D., Lebedev V.G. Industrial Products Evaluation and Quality Management Methods. Textbook – Moscow. Filin Information and Publishing House, Rilant, 2000. – 328 p.

7. Fediukin V.K. Qualimetry. Saint-Petersburg. SPbGIEU, 2009. Мoscow. – 365 p.

8. Kirillov V.I. Qualimetry and System Analysis. – Minsk. Novoie znanie: Мoscow. INFRA-М, 2012. – 440 p.

9. Semionov S.S., Kharchev V.N., Ioffin A.I. Weapon System Performance Evaluation as a Significant Factor of its Development // Voienny Parad. – 1995 – № 1-2. – P. 174-176 (P. 87-89 in English).

10. Semionov S.S., Kharchev V.N., Ioffin A.I. Performance Evaluation of Weapon Systems and Hardware. − Мoscow. Radio i sviaz, 2004. − 552 p.

11. Semionov S.S. Performance Evaluation of the Guidance Systems of Air-to-Surface Aircraft Weapon Systems // Vestnik kompiuternykh i informatsionnykh tekhnologiy. – 2006. – No. 8 – P. 7-11; No. 9 – P. 13-23; No. 10 – P. 12-18.

12. Semionov S.S., Shcherbinin V.V. Method of Performance Evaluation of the Guidance Systems of Guided Aerial Bombs // Voprosi oboronnoy tekhniki. Ser. 9. Special control systems, tracking drives and their elements. Moscow. FGUP NTTs Informtekhnika, 2010. – Issue 1 (242) – 2 (243). – 471 p. – P. 29-32.

13. Semionov S.S. Experience of Scientific Recognition of New Methods of Weapon Systems and Hardware Performance Evaluation through the Example of Guided Aerial Bombs // Boyepripasy. – 2007. – No. 5-6. – 214 p.

14. Spirkin A.G. Fundamentals of Philosophy. Moscow. Voenizdat, 1988. – 592 p. – P. 179.

15. Tsvirkun A.D. Structure of Complex Systems. Moscow. Sovietskoie radio, 1975. – 200 p.

16. Prangishvili I.V. System Approach and Systemic Consistency. Moscow. Sinteg, 2000. – 528 p.

17. GOST R ISO/IEC 15288 – 2005. Russian National Standard. Information Technology. System Engineering. ISO/IEC 15288:2002. System engineering – System life cycle processes (IDT). – Moscow. Federal Agency for Technical Regulation and Metrology, 2006. – 54 p.

18. Polovinkin V., Dyshkantiuk А. Systemic Approach to Naval Weapon Systems Lifecycle Evaluation and Implementation Methods // Morskoy sbornik. – 2009. – No. 7. – P. 23-28.

19. Raiffa H. Decision Analysis (Introductory Lectures on Choices Under Uncertainty). Moscow. Nauka, Main office of physics and mathematics literature, 1977. – 408 p.

20. Andreichikov A.V., Andreichikova O.N. System Analysis of Strategic Decisions in Innovation Theory. Mathematical, heuristic and intellectual methods of system analysis and innovation synergy. – Moscow. Knizhny dom LIBROKOM, 2013. – 304 p.

21. Samkov T.D. Theory of Decision-Making: Lecture Notes. – Novosibirsk: – NGTU, 2010. – 107 p.

22. Technology Dependability and Efficiency: Reference book. Efficiency of engineering systems / Edited by Utkin, V.F., Kriuchkov, Yu.V. Moscow. Machinostroenie, 1988. – 328 p.


Review

For citations:


Semenov S.S., Poltavsky A.V., Maklakov V.V. PROCESS OF DECISION-MAKING IN DEVELOPMENT OF COMPLEX TECHNICAL SYSTEMS AND THE TASK OF CHOICE OF ALTERNATIVES. Dependability. 2014;(4):122-138. https://doi.org/10.21683/1729-2646-2014-0-4-122-138

Views: 890


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1729-2646 (Print)
ISSN 2500-3909 (Online)