Preview

Dependability

Advanced search

Increasing the reliability of stress tolerance prediction as part of aptitude screening of flight specialists

https://doi.org/10.21683/1729-2646-2020-20-4-61-66

Abstract

Aim. The paper describes a research aimed at improving the reliability of stress tolerance prediction as part of aptitude screening (AS) of flight school applicants using a proprietary objectifying method of Stress Tolerance Assessment. Stress tolerance (ST) is an important psychophysiological professional quality and serves as one of the factors ensuring both successful flight training, and further professional flight work. However, the methods recommended in regulatory documents for the purpose of ST identification as part of AS are not efficient enough and are affected by subjective factors. Therefore, an objective and thus more efficient method is still required. Methods. The method was developed based on the analysis of subject-matter literature and own experience. Stress stimuli and methods of indicator recording were selected based on their empirical verification. The stress-inducing property of the stimuli was confirmed by the pulse rate increase by 40 – 100% and higher, associated behavioural manifestations and significant dynamics of mental productivity in the course of tests. Out of the methods of mathematical statistics, the authors used correlation analysis. Results. The method of ST assessment is based on the Reakor multifunctional psychophysiological system by the Medicom MTD research and development company from Taganrog, Russia, with a proprietary procedure built in the system’s software. As stress stimulus material and for performance assessment, arithmetically complicated problems were selected, whose solutions involve a larger portion (areas) of the brain than verbal tests. In order to eliminate the effect of habituation and learning, the arithmetic tests were displayed one by one on a computer screen in a random order. The 3-4-second time interval between individual problems was selected based on premises of aviation psychology and tests conducted on a group of students. The sample consisted of 1135 male applicants to the higher flight school in 2016. Correlation analysis shows that the correlations between the external criterion indicators (successful simulator training and flying practice) and the integrated ST indicator are statistically significant: the higher is the ST indicator measured in the course of AS using the respective method, the higher are the expert estimates of the simulator training and flying practice. Conclusion. Thus, the conducted research showed that the application of the developed method of ST assessment in the course of higher flight school AS ensures higher predicted stress tolerance in the selected candidates as the psychophysiological factor of professional efficiency and reliability of flight personnel.

About the Authors

E. A. Krachko
Hero of the Soviet Union A.K. Serov Krasnodar Higher Aviation School of Pilots
Russian Federation

Elvira A. Krachko, Candidate of Medicine, Head of Research Laboratory of Psychophysiological Aspects of Professional Training of Flight Personnel, Scientific Research Department

Krasnodar



G. T. Krasilnikov
Hero of the Soviet Union A.K. Serov Krasnodar Higher Aviation School of Pilots; Kuban State Medical University
Russian Federation

Gennady T. Krasilnikov, Doctor of Medicine, Professor, Senior Researcher, Scientific Research Department for Aptitude Screening and Professional Psychological Coaching of Flight Personnel

Krasnodar



F. V. Malchinsky
Hero of the Soviet Union A.K. Serov Krasnodar Higher Aviation School of Pilots
Russian Federation

Fedor V. Malchinsky, Candidate of Psychology, Head of Scientific Research Department for Aptitude Screening and Professional Psychological Coaching of Flight Personnel

Krasnodar



V. I. Medvedev
Hero of the Soviet Union A.K. Serov Krasnodar Higher Aviation School of Pilots
Russian Federation

Valery A. Medvedev, Candidate of History, Associate Professor, Deputy Headmaster for Academic Affairs and Research

Krasnodar



References

1. [Concept of flight safety of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation]. Approved by the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation on 31.05.2017. Moscow: Aviation Flight Safety Service of the Armed Forces; 2017. (in Russ.)

2. Arinicheva O.V., Malishevsky A.V. Improving the reliability of professional psychological selection of aviation specialists. Dependability 2019;19(1):40-47. https://doi.org/10.21683/1729-2646-2019-19-1-40-47.

3. Gander D.V., Vorona A.A., Ponomarenko V.A. et al. Methodological and theoretical premises of the psychological research of the flight work at the current stage of development of aviation. Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika 2016;11:906-912. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0722.2016.11.22442. (in Russ.)

4. Krachko E.A., Krasilnikov G.T., Malchinsky F.V. et al. Reliability of forecast of successful flight training based on professional psychological selection. Dependability 2018;18(3):27-30. https://doi.org/10.21683/17292646-2018-18-3-27-30.

5. Lapa V.V., Ponomarenko V.A., Chuntul A.V. [Psychophysiology of flight safety]. Moscow: [Association of Law Enforcement Journalists]; 2013. (in Russ.)

6. Nikiforov D.A., Vorona A.A., Bogomolov A.V. Technique of estimation of potential unreliability of actions of the pilot. Life Safety 2015;7:7-16. (in Russ.)

7. Plotnikov N.I. The bases of human – operator dependability theory. Dependability 2015;2:94-97. DOI:10.21683/1729-2640-2016-16-3-3-7.

8. Ponomarenko V.A. [Flight safety, the pain of aviation]. Moscow: Flinta; 2007. (in Russ.)

9. Ponomarenko V.A. [A professional’s spiritual psychology]. Moscow: PER SE; 2004. (in Russ.)

10. Alioshin S.V. [Safety and stress]. In: Kozlov V.V., editor. [Human factor: new approaches to air accident prevention: a collection of articles]. Moscow; 2000:59-65. (in Russ.)

11. Zarakovsky G.M., Lazutin V.I., editors. [Fundamentals of aptitude screening: a teaching aid]. Moscow: Voenizdat; 2005. (in Russ.)

12. [Guidelines for the organization and conducting of aptitude screening in the military education establishments of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation]. Moscow; 2002. (in Russ.)

13. Blaginin A.A. [Professional reliability of pilots]. In: [Physiology of flight work: a textbook]. Saint Petersburg: Nauka; 1997. (in Russ.)

14. Marishchuk V.L., Evdokimov V.I. [Human behaviour and self-direction under stress]. Saint Petersburg: Izdatelskiy dom “Sentyabr”; 2001. (in Russ.)

15. Ponomarenko V.A. [The psychology of the human factor in a hazardous occupation]. Krasnoyarsk: Polikom; 2006. (in Russ.)

16. Pokrovsky B.L. [Emotional stress]. In: Ponomarenko V.S., Vasiliev P.V., editors. [Functional state of a pilot in extreme situations]. Moscow: Poliot; 1994. (in Russ.)

17. Lomov B.F. [Methodological and theoretical problems of psychology]. Moscow: Nauka; 1984. (in Russ.)

18. Bodrov V.A., Orlov V.Ya. [Psychology and dependability: human being in control systems]. Moscow: Institute of Psychology of the RAS Publishing; 1998. (in Russ.)

19. Kitaev-Smyk L.A. [Psychology of stress]. Moscow: Akademichesky proiekt; 2009. (in Russ.)

20. Roik A.O., Ivanitsky G.A. Neurophysiological model of cognitive space. Journal of Higher Nervous Activity 2011;60(6):688-696. (in Russ.)

21. Aydarkin E.K., Fomina A.S. [Research of the dynamics of spatial synchronization cerebral biopotentials while solving complex arithmetical problems]. Journal of Health and Life Sciences 2012;3:91-106. (in Russ.)

22. Bodrov V.A. [Information overload: a study guide for higher education establishments]. Moscow: PER SE; 2000. (in Russ.)

23. Aliushin M.V. [Minimizing the habituation effect during psychological testing]. Voprosy Psychologii 2015;3:153-160. (in Russ.)

24. Krasilnikov G.T., Krachko E.A., Malchinsky F.V. [Development of the method for identifying the stress tolerance in the applicants to a higher military aviation school]. In: Proceedings of the XV South-of-Russia Research and Practice Conference Innovation Technology in the Educational Process. Krasnodar: MAC, Subsidiary of AF MESC. 2013. Vol. 2. 173-181. (in Russ.)

25. Krasilnikov G.T., Krachko E.A., Malchinsky F.V. [Matters of research of the experimental stress of hazardous occupations]. In: Proceedings of the Anniversary Conference From the Origins to the Present Day (130 years of the Moscow University’s Psychological Society) in 5 volumes. Vol. 5. Moscow. 2015. 9-21. (in Russ.)

26. Kosachiov V.E., Agopov I.V., Usov V.M. [Qualimetric approach to the study of professionally important qualities]. In: [Development of the ideas of B.F. Lomov in the research of labor and industrial psychology]. Moscow; 1992. (in Russ.)

27. Ponomarenko V.A., Vorona A.A., editors. [Formation and development of professionally important qualities in military students in the course of training in the HMASP]. Moscow: Voenizdat; 1992. (in Russ.)

28. Krachko E.A., Krasilnikov G.T., Malchinsky F.V. [Psychophysiological aspect of the research of the stress tolerance in flight personnel]. In: Proceedings of the XXIII Convention of the I.P. Pavlov Russian Physiological Society. Voronezh: Izdatelstvo Istoki. 2017. 1278-1279. (in Russ.)

29. Krachko E.A., Krasilnikov G.T., Malchinsky F.V. [Development of a stress-inducing stimulus for the method of stress tolerance assessment]. In: Proceedings of the Science and Practice Conference Dedicated to the 20-th Anniversary of the Department of Military Psychophysiology of the Military Medical Academy: Psychophysiology of Occupational Health. Saint Petersburg: VMedA. 2017. 192-197. (in Russ.) 192–197 [in Russian].

30. Krachko E.A., Krasilnikov G.T., Malchinsky F.V. [Research of the stress tolerance in the applicants to a higher military school of pilots]. Izvestia of the Russian Military Medical Academy 2019;38(3):34-41. (in Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Krachko E.A., Krasilnikov G.T., Malchinsky F.V., Medvedev V.I. Increasing the reliability of stress tolerance prediction as part of aptitude screening of flight specialists. Dependability. 2020;20(4):61-66. https://doi.org/10.21683/1729-2646-2020-20-4-61-66

Views: 634


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1729-2646 (Print)
ISSN 2500-3909 (Online)