Calculation of an SPTA set using the Dialog computer simulation system (Part 1. General provisions for the calculation of an SPTA set)
https://doi.org/10.21683/1729-2646-2020-20-1-32-38
Abstract
The paper describes the design concept of the DIALOG simulation software suite (SSS) intended for calculating the dependability indicators of electronic systems (ES) of random configuration, as well as solving problems associated with assuring the functional dependability of such systems. The DIALOG SSS employs a specially designed DIALOG-SINTEZ technology that enables automatic synthesis of event simulation models in the form of programs in the selected programming language. In DIALOG SSS, the input data include: system composition in the form of a combination of conventional blocks; criteria of failure event occurrence and repairs; random value parameters (failures of system components in various modes of operation, SPTA requests, etc.); stages of system operation and types of repairs; list of calculated indicators. For the purpose of ensuring the required indicators, the simulation models undergo statistical testing under modified indicators of random values in each new test. Based on the accumulated results of all the performed tests the required indicators are calculated. The DIALOG SSS consists of four components: DIALOG-NRS is intended for the calculation of dependability indicators of non-repairable redundant systems; DIALOG-RRS is intended for the calculation of dependability indicators of repairable redundant systems, as well as the number of and cost of warranty repairs; DIALOG-ZIP-NS is intended for SPTA sets calculation for simple non-redundant systems; DIALOG-ZIP-RS is intended for SPTA sets calculation for any redundant systems. SPTA set calculation is normally done using standard procedures described in regulatory documents. In solving the direct problem of optimal SPTA set calculation, the input data includes the required value of one of the two SPTA sufficiency indicators (SI) and type of costs that are to be optimized (minimized) in order to achieve the target values of SI. In solving the inverse problem of optimal SPTA set calculation, it is required to ensure the specified costs of the initial SPTA supply. As the SPTA supply SI, the mean spare parts (SP) supply delay time out of SPTA Δtd.SPTA and SPTA availability coefficient Ca.SPTA are used. SPTA optimization using the DIALOG-ZIP SSS allows improving user options through the following additional characteristics: SPTA SP failure logging; optimization of SP count and accounting for the their characteristic features for the purpose of SP emergency delivery (ED); capability to use products with any type of redundancy; when using SPTA-G group set, capability to include differently-structured products into ESs. The paper sets forth the structure diagram of the DIALOG SSS programs interaction, that implies three modes of operation of the simulation model: SI calculation for specific SPTA contents; calculation of preliminary SPTA supply before the beginning of optimization; calculation of optimal SPTA set. The authors examine the matters related to the selection of the required number and duration of simulation model testing.
About the Authors
B. A. DolgopolovRussian Federation
Boris A. Dolgopolov, Lead Engineer
Moscow
Yu. G. Zayko
Russian Federation
Yuri G. Zayko, Candidate of Engineering, Associate Professor, Senior Researcher, Head of Unit
Moscow
V. A. Mikhailov
Russian Federation
Viktor A. Mikhailov, Doctor of Engineering, Deputy Director General for Onboard Equipment Development
Moscow
A. V. Trakhtomirov
Ukraine
Alexander V. Trakhtomirov, Director
KharkovReferences
1. Dykina T.K., Zayko Yu.G., Ivanov [1] V.N. et al. [Design principles of a dialog simulation system for CS dependability research]. Problemy upravleniya dvizheniem i navigatsii. 1989;24:29-36. (in Russ.)
2. Zayko Y.G., Iskandarova L.N., Trakhtomirov A.V. Simulation model to calculate the indices of reliability of redundant radio electronic systems. Dependability. 2016;16(3):8-17. (In Russ.)
3. MacDougall M.H., Dietmeyer D., Duley J.R. Digital system design automation: languages, simulation and data base. Мoscow: Mir; 1979.
4. Schmidt B. GPSS-Fortran. Version II. Einfuhrung in die Simulation diskreter Systeme mit Hilfe eines FORTRANProgrammpaketes. Berlin Heidelberg: SpringerVerlag; 1978.
5. Polovko АМ. [Fundamentals of the dependability theory]. Moscow: Nauka; 1964. (in Russ.)
6. [RD V 319.01.19‑98. Comprehensive quality control system. Military-purpose hardware, instruments, devices and equipment. Methods of estimation and calculation of supplies in SPTA sets. Brought into force on 15.06.1999]. Moscow: Technical committee for military standardization no. 319; 1998. (in Russ.)
7. [GOST RV 27.3.03‑2005. Dependability of military hardware. Estimation and calculation of supplies in SPTA sets. Brought into force on 01.01.2006]. Moscow: Standartinform; 2005. (in Russ.)
8. GOST 27.005-97 Reliability in technique. Spare parts, tools and accessories. Evaluation and calculation of reserves. Brought into force on 03.01.2017. Moscow: Standartinform: 2016. (in Russ.)
9. Golovin I.N., Chuvarygin B.V., Shura-Bura A.E. [Calculation and optimization of spare part kits of radioelectronic systems]. Moscow: Radio i sviaz; 1984. (in Russ.)
10. Knuth D.E. The art of computer programming. Vol. 2. Seminumerical algorithms. Moscow: Mir; 1977.
Review
For citations:
Dolgopolov B.A., Zayko Yu.G., Mikhailov V.A., Trakhtomirov A.V. Calculation of an SPTA set using the Dialog computer simulation system (Part 1. General provisions for the calculation of an SPTA set). Dependability. 2020;20(1):32-38. https://doi.org/10.21683/1729-2646-2020-20-1-32-38