Method of identification of the ranges of (non)acceptable factor values to reduce the risk of freight car derailment due to broken bogie solebar

Aim. According to the Russian freight car crash/derailment investigation records for the period between 2013 and 2016., derailments and crashes during train operations were mostly caused by rolling stock malfunctions, while about a third of such derailments were due to bogie solebar fracture. The average number of derailed units of rolling stock is 4.16 in case of derailment due to solebar fracture against 1.73 in case of derailments due to other rolling stock malfunctions. Previously, a method was developed that allows making decisions to discard a batch of solebars. On the other hand, solebars from batches exempt from discarding can be subject to fractures over time. In this context, it appears to be of relevance to develop a method that would enable timely uncoupling of a car for its submission to depot/full repairs in order to avoid solebar fracture. For this purpose, factor models of fracture hazard estimation should be considered. Such factors may include the number of kilometers travelled from the last maintenance depot (MD), as well as the number of kilometers and days until the next scheduled full/depot repairs. The probability of solebar fracture can be used as the quantitative characteristic of the hazard of solebar fracture. However, probability estimation in the form of, for instance, the frequency of solebar fracture is only possible when observation data is available on when fracture or critical defect of solebar did not occur, yet such data is not collected. Therefore, the hazard index of solebar fracture should be developed. As it is difficult to manage the frequency of car submission to MD, the hazard index must depend only on the number of days and kilometers to repairs. Using the constructed index, the ranges of (non) acceptable factor values must be defined in order to enable decision-making regarding car uncoupling and submission to repairs, should the MD car inspector have doubts regarding the necessity of uncoupling. Methods. Methods of mathematical programming were used in this paper. Results. Conclusions. An impact index was built that characterizes the probability of freight car solebar fracture depending on the number of days and kilometers until the next scheduled repairs of such car. Based on that index, two methods of definition of ranges of (non)acceptable factor values were proposed. The first method was based on the values of the impact index. The second one was based on the identification of some parameters of ranges of (non)acceptable factor values and selection – out of all ranges – of the best ones in terms the lowest hazard of solebar fracture. Such selection was made by solving problems of mixed integer programming with quadratic constraint.

1. GOST 33433-2015. Functional safety. Risk management on railway transport. Moscow: Standartinform; 2016 [in Russian].

2. Novozhilov EO. Guidelines for construction of a risk matrix. Dependability 2015;3:80-86.

3. Liu X, Saat MR, Qin X, Barkan CPL. Analysis of U.S. freight-train derailment severity using zero-truncated negative binomial regression and quantile regression. Accident Analysis and Prevention 2013;59:87-93.

4. Bagheri M, Saccomanno F, Chenouri S, Fu LP. Reducing the threat of in-transit derailments involving dangerous goods through effective placement along the train consist. Accident Analysis and Prevention 2011;43:613-620.

5. Zamyshliaev AM, Ignatov AN, Kibzun AI, Novozhilov EO. Functional dependency between the number of wagons derailed due to wagon or track defects and the traffic factors. Dependability 2018;18(1):53-60.

6. Anderson RT, Barkan CPL. Derailment probability analysis and modeling of mainline freight trains. Proceedings of the 8th International Heavy Haul Conference, International Heavy Haul Association, Rio de Janeiro; 2005. p. 491-497.

7. Schafer DH. Effect of Train Length on Railroad Accidents and a Quantitative Analysis of Factors Affecting Broken Rails. MS thesis. University of Illinois at Urbana– Champaign; 2006.

8. Zamyshliaev AM, Kan YuS, Kibzun AI, Shubinsky IB. Statisticheskaya otsenka opasnosti vozniknoveniya proisshestviy na zheleznodorozhnom transporte [Statistical evaluation of accident hazard in railway transportation]. Dependability 2012;2:104-117 [in Russian].

9. Lukin VV, Belsky AO. Calculation of the side frame and bolster freight car bogie finite element method. The Trans-Siberian Bulletin 2013;1(13):7-12 [in Russian].

10. Galiev II, Nikolaev VA, Sergeyev BB, Samohvalov EA, Loucks DY. The reasons for violations of traffic safety of freight cars in operation. The Trans-Siberian Bulletin 2013:3(15):133-141 [in Russian].

11. Kim JS, Shin KB, Yoon HJ, Lee WG. Durability evaluation of a composite bogie frame with bow-shaped side beams. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 2012;26(2):531-536.

12. Method of categorization of freight cars as having reduced operational safety in terms of dependability and safety of cast parts of bogies (solebars). Approved by the Commission for Rail Traffic Safety of the Railway Transportation Council. Proceedings no. 1 of June 6-7, 2013. Approved by the Commission of Authorized Rolling Stock Specialists of Railway Administrations of the Railway Transportation Council. Proceedings no. 55 of February 19-21, 2013.

13. Regulations on the service and repair system of freight cars cleared for operation in public tracks on international routes. Approved by the Proceedings of the FiftySeventh Meeting of the Railway Transportation Council of the Members of the Commonwealth of Independent States, October 16-17, 2012.

14. Kibzun AI, Ignatov AN. Metodika organizatsii profilaktiki transportnogo proisshestviya [Method of organization of transportation accident prevention]. In: Proceedings of the Second Science and Engineering Conference Intelligent Control Systems in Railway Transportation ISUZhT 2013; 2013. p. 177-179.