Economic assessment of the accidental risk of natural emergencies for train traffic

Aim. The paper is dedicated to the evaluation of the risk of transportation accidents caused by natural emergencies affecting train traffic on a specific line. The ever-growing anthropogenic burden on the environment inevitably causes climate change that, in turn, gives rise to higher numbers of extreme weather events. The latter usually cause industrial accidents and disasters. The assessment of the factors of climate-related risk that quantitatively characterize their effect on the railway infrastructure is the starting point of calamity risk management and adaptation of human activities to the ever-changing climate.

Methods. The authors propose a method of risk assessment that takes into consideration the effect of various natural emergencies that affect rolling stock in motion. The method is based on elements of the probability theory and mathematical statistics. The developed method enables the assessment of the risk of a transportation accident caused by natural emergencies specific to not only a line, but a route on a railway network.

Results. For the Nevinnomysskaya – Tuapse line that includes 6 sections of the North Caucasus Railway, one of which was damaged due to abundant precipitations on October 24 and 25, 2018, the risk of transportation accident caused by the effects of three types of natural emergencies on the sociotechnical system of this line has been calculated:

– flood,

– hurricane with wind strength of over 22 mps,

– heavy rain.

The parameters of such emergencies are characterized by the following factors:

– frequency as compared to other types of emergencies,

– average annual number of natural emergencies,

– characteristic spatial scale of the natural emergency,

– characteristic duration of the natural emergency.

The conditional probabilities of the effects on the railway sociotechnical system of an event that has characteristic spatial scale and duration and has caused a transportation accident involving a train were estimated based on the assumption that a train flow in space follows the normal Erlang distribution of the k-th kind. The risk of transportation accident involving up and down trains travelling along the i-th line of the j-th railway caused by a hazardous effect of a natural emergency of the m-th type is identified subject to the jointness of events. Using the discounting method, an equation was obtained for estimating the mathematical expectation of economic damage by traffic safety disturbances, which allowed estimating the economic component of the risk.

Conclusions. As the result, a method is proposed for estimation of the risk of transportation accidents caused by natural emergencies, an example is provided of such risk estimation, including the economic component, for the Nevinnomysskaya – Tuapse line.

1. Katsov V.M., editor. Doklad o klimaticheskikh riskakh na territorii Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Report on the climaterelated risks in the Russian Federation]. Saint Petersburg; 2017 [in Russian].

2. Ragozin A.L., editor. Otsenka i upravlenie prirodnymi riskami: tematicheskiy tom [Assessment and management of natural risks: a subject-matter publication]. Moscow: Izdatelskaya firma KRUK; 2003 [in Russian].

3. Akimov V.A., Lesnykh V.V., Radaev N.N. Osnovy analiza i upravleniya riskom v prirodnoy i tekhnogennoy sferakh [Basics of the natural and man-made risk analysis and management]. Moscow: Delovoy ekspress; 2004 [ In Russian].

4. GOST 33433-2015. Functional safety. Risk management on railway transport. Moscow: Standartinform; 2016 [in Russian].

5. Volodarsky V.A., Orlenko A.I. On the dependability of reconditioned rolling stock. Dependability. 2015;1(52):29-31.

6. Zamyshliaev A.M., Ignatov A.N., Kibzun A.I., Novozhilov E.O. Functional dependency between the number of wagons derailed due to wagon or track defects and the traffic factors. Dependability 2018;18(1):53-60.

7. Dayev Zh.A., Nurushev E.T. Application of statistical criteria for improving the efficiency of risk assessment methods. Dependability 2018;18(2):42-45.

8. Aksenov V.A., Raenok D.L., Zavyalov A.M. Improving the system of risk management to ensure the safety of production processes. Dependability 2013;(3):112-120.

9. Popov V.G., Sukhov F.I., Bolandova Yu.K. Accidental risk assessment of train movement consequently the impact of natural emergencies in the environment. Science and Technology in Transport 2018;4:115-120 [in Russian].

10. Decree of the Ministry of Transportation of the Russian Federation no. 344 of December 18, 2014 On the approval of the regulations on the classification, procedure of investigation and registration of transportation accidents and other events caused by violations of rules of traffic safety and operation of railway transport (Registered by the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation on 26.02.2015, no. 36209).

11. Legasov V.A., Demin V.F., Shevelev Ya.V. Diskontirovanie i kompromiss mezhdu pokoleniyami [Discounting and compromise between generations]. Issues of Risk Analysis 2005;2(2):141-146 [in Russian].

12. Kraskovsky A.Е. Ekonomicheskie mekhanizmy upravleniya bezopasnostyu dvizheniya [Economic mechanisms of traffic safety management]. Zheleznodorozhny transport 2002;5:29-33 [in Russian].

13. Popov V.G., Sukhov F.I. Indeks prognoz and indeks otklik [Prediction index and response index]. World of Transport and Transportation 2007;5(3):130-133 [in Russian].

14. Popov V.G., Petrov S.V. Metod otsenki urovnya bezopasnosti dvizheniya i avariynogo riska pri perevozke gruzov po zheleznym dorogam [Method of assessment of traffic safety and accidental risk associated with carriage of goods by rail]. Transport: science, equipment, management 2008;7:1-5 [in Russian].

15. Popov V.G., Petrov S.V. Metod otsenki avariynogo riska pri perevozke nefti i nefteproduktov po zheleznym dorogam [Method of assessment of accidental risk associated with the rail transportation of oil and petroleum products]. Life safety 2010;11:39-43 [in Russian].

16. Popov V.G., Sukhov F.I., Petrov S.V. Accident risk assessment. World of Transport and Transportation 2012;6;150-155 [in Russian].