Model of efficiency assessment of diagnostic tools of onboard equipment
https://doi.org/10.21683/1729-2646-2019-19-2-28-32
Abstract
The Aim of this paper is to show that the development, deployment of new diagnostic tools and improvement of the existing diagnostic tools in onboard equipment enables better operational characteristics and reduced probability of transition of intelligent railway systems into a forbidden state.
Method. In the context of intelligent railway systems, the construction of the analytical model of probability evaluation is of principal interest due to the feasibility of demonstrating the factors that are taken into consideration by such a model. Forbidden events that cause inoperability of intelligent railway systems are random; they can be represented as a random process. A random process of system development, transition from an allowed state into a forbidden state, system state changes in time can be described with a semi-Markovian process. When assessing the probability of system transition into a forbidden state, the question arises as to the selection of a method of calculation. The paper shows the feasibility of representation and solution of a semi-Markovian model with the help of a coupled graph model [3, 5] that has a high level of visualization and is a well-formalized method of identification of the probability of a system’s transition into a forbidden state. The set of system states and their connections are represented with a directed state graph with defined topological concepts [3]. In order to identify the effect of the introduction of new diagnostic tools and improvement of the existing diagnostic tools in onboard equipment on the probability of transition of intelligent railway systems into a forbidden state, the authors use the theorem of identification of the probability of system’s transition from the initial unhazardous state into a hazardous state and set forth the formula to calculate this probability.
Results. The graph method implemented in this paper shows that the use of additional diagnostic tools reduces more than twice the probability of a system’s transition into a forbidden state, i.e. a state when the failure will not be detected by the inbuilt or additional diagnostic tools.
About the Authors
E. N. RozenbergRussian Federation
Efim N. Rozenberg, Professor, Doctor of Engineering, First Deputy Director General
Moscow
A. S. Korovin
Russian Federation
Alexander S. Korovin, Chief Specialist of Computer-Based Devices Development Sector
Moscow
N. G. Penkova
Russian Federation
Natalia G. Penkova, Deputy Head of Safety and Algorithmic Support
Moscow
References
1. Ivnitsky V.A. Modelirovaniye informatsionnykh sistem zheleznodorozhnogo transporta. Uchebnoye posobiye [Simulation of information systems of the railway industry. Study guide]. Moscow: MIIT; 2011 [in Russian].
2. Shubinsky I.B. Funktsionalnaya nadezhnost informatsionnykh sistem: Metody analiza [Functional dependability of information systems. Analysis methods]. Moscow: Dependability Journal; 2012 [in Russian].
3. Shubinsky I.B. Nadiozhnie otkazoustoychivie informatsionnie sistemy. Metody sinteza [Dependable failsafe information systems. Synthesis methods]. Moscow: Dependability Journal; 2016 [in Russian].
4. Shubinsky I.B. O poniatii funktsionalnoy nadezhnosti [On the concept of functional dependability]. Dependability 2012;4:74-84 [in Russian].
5. Shubinsky I.B. Methods of software functional dependability assurance. Dependability 2014;4:95-101.
6. Shubinsky I.B., Zamyshlyaev A.M., Pronevich O.B. Graph method for evaluation of process safety in railway facilities. Dependability 2017;17(1):40-45.
7. Pronevich O.B., Shved V.E. Algorithm of calculation and forecasting of functional safety indicators of railway power supply systems. Dependability 2018;18(3):46-55.
8. Rozenberg E.N., Penkova N.G., Korovin A.S. Functional dependability of the display unit software of the BLOK system. Dependability. 2017;17(2):36-40.
9. Shukhina E.E., Astrakhan V.I. Bezopasny lokomotivny obiedinenny kompleks BLOK [BLOK vital integrated onboard system]. Moscow; 2013 [in Russian].
10. Zorin V.I., Astrakhan V.I. Unifitsirovannoe kompleksnoe lokomotivnoe ustroystvo bezopasnosti (KLUB-U) [Standardized integrated onboard train protection system (KLUB-U)]. Moscow: Training and Methodology Centre for Railway Transport; 2008 [In Russian].
11. GOST R IEC 61508–7–2012. Functional safety of electrical, electronic, programmable electronic safety-related systems. Part 7. Techniques and measures. Moscow: Standartinform; 2014 [in Russian].
Review
For citations:
Rozenberg E.N., Korovin A.S., Penkova N.G. Model of efficiency assessment of diagnostic tools of onboard equipment. Dependability. 2019;19(2):28-32. https://doi.org/10.21683/1729-2646-2019-19-2-28-32