Preview

Dependability

Advanced search

The effect of the structural composition on the resilience of pipeline systems to node damage

https://doi.org/10.21683/1729-2646-2019-19-1-24-29

Abstract

The Aim of this paper is to study the effect of the structural features of pipeline systems on the development of emergency situations by the mechanism of progressive blocking of transportation nodes. The blocking of an individual point element of a system is considered as the result of simultaneous failure of all the pipelines converging into the node. The process of progressive blocking of a certain set of nodes of a pipeline system in random order is called a progressive blocking. The development of progressive blocking is associated with the disconnection of the consumers from the source of end product and is a dangerous scenario of emergency development. The system’s resilience against progressive blocking is estimated by the resilience indicator F„, the average share of the system’s nodes whose blocking in a random order causes the disconnection of all consumers from the source of the end product.

Methods of research. The values of 0 <F„< 1 were identified by means of computer simulation. After each fact of damage associated with a random blocking of an individual node, the connection between the source and consumers of the end product was established. The statistical characteristics of the process of progressive blocking were evaluated according to the results of repeated simulation of the procedure of damage of the analyzed network structure. In general, the structure of a pipeline system is characterized by a graph that describes the connections between point elements. The valence of an individual graph node is the number of edges that converge into it. Similarly, the valence of the respective network node is the number of converging linear elements (pipelines). Furthermore, an important characteristic of an individual node is the composition of the converging linear elements. Thus, the set of a system’s linear elements includes the following varieties that ensure the connection between: the source and the consumer (subset G1), two consumers (subset G2), a consumer and a hub (subset G3), two hubs (subset G4), the source and a hub (subset G5).

Results. The author analyzed and examined the effect of the structural characteristics on the ability of pipeline systems to resist the development of emergency situations through the mechanism of progressive blocking of nodes. It was established that with regard to structural optimization the most pronounces positive effect associated with the increase of the values F^ is observed as the valence of the source node grows and additional linear elements of subset G1 are included in the system.

Conclusions. The process of progressive blocking of pipeline transportation system nodes is a hazardous development scenario of an emergency situation. The most efficient method of improving pipeline system resilience against progressive blocking consists in increasing the valence of the source node and inclusion of additional linear elements of subset G1 in the system. Structural optimization of pipeline systems should be achieved by defining the values F^ for each of the alternatives with subsequent adoption of a substantiated design solution.

About the Author

I. A. Tararychkin
V. Dal Lugansk National University
Ukraine

Igor A. Tararychkin, Doctor of Engineering, Professor 

Lugansk

 



References

1. Winston R, editor. Oil and Gas Pipelines. Integrity and Safety Handbook. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2015.

2. Menon SE. Pipeline Planning and Construction Field Manual. Gulf Professional Publishing, USA; 2011.

3. Silowash B. Piping Systems Manual. The McGrawHill Companies, Inc.; 2010.

4. Sverdlov A.B. Dependability analysis of gas compression units. Dependability 2015;2(53):65-67.

5. Tkachev OA. Reliability analysis of networks consisting of identical elements. Dependability 2014;(1):45-59.

6. Cherkesov GN, Nedosekin AO, Vinogradov VV.Functional survivability analysis of structurally complex technical systems. Dependability 2018;18(2):17-24.

7. Cherkesov GN, Nedosekin AO. Description of approach to estimating survivability of complex structures under repeated impacts of high accuracy. Dependability 2016;16(2):3-15.

8. Deyneko SV. Obespechenie nadezhnosti sistem truboprovodnogo transporta nefti i gaza [Ensuring the dependability of oil and gas pipeline transportation systems]. Moscow: Tekhnika, TUMA GRUPP; 2011 [in Russian].

9. Tararychkin IA, Blinov SP. Osobennosti povrezhdeniya setevykh struktur i razvitiya avariynykh situatsiy na obiektakh truboprovodnogo transporta [The distinctive features of damage to network structures and development of accidents in pipeline transportation facilities]. Bezopasnost truda v promyshlennosti 2018;3:35-39 [in Russian].

10. Tararychkin IA, Blinov SP. Simulation of the process of damage to pipeline network structures. World of Transport and Transportation 2017;15(2):6-19 [in Russian].

11. Tutte W. Graph theory. Moscow: Mir; 1988.

12. Tararychkin IA. Ensuring resilience of pipeline transportation systems to damage to network structure elements. Dependability 2018;18(1):26-31.


Review

For citations:


Tararychkin I.A. The effect of the structural composition on the resilience of pipeline systems to node damage. Dependability. 2019;19(1):24-29. https://doi.org/10.21683/1729-2646-2019-19-1-24-29

Views: 733


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1729-2646 (Print)
ISSN 2500-3909 (Online)