Ensuring the dependability of technical facilities through triplication and quadrupling

Redundancy, e.g. structural redundancy, is one of the primary methods of improving the dependability, ensures failsafety and fault tolerance of components, devices and systems. According to the International Patent Classification (IPC), the class of systems and methods G06F11/18 is defined as «using passive fault-masking of the redundant circuits, e.g. by quadrupling or by majority decision circuits». Obviously, «fault-masking» masks not only faults, but failures as well. The majority decision circuits (MDC) in the minimal configuration implements a «2-out-of-3» choice. According to the above definition, such redundancy should not require a special decision circuit. However, that is not always the case. In cases when the resulting signal out of a quadruple logic is delivered to, for instance, an executive device, a «3-outof-4» selection circuit is required anyway. Another dependability-improving solution is defined by class G06F 11/20, «using active fault-masking, e.g. by switching out faulty elements or by switching in spare elements». The word «active» is missing here, thus we have active and passive fault tolerance. The paper examines passive fault tolerance that uses triplication and quadrupling and compares the respective probabilities of no-failure.The Weibull distribution is used that most adequately describes dependability in terms of radiation durability under the effects of heavy ions. It shows that in a number of cases quadrupling has a lower redundancy than triplication. A formula is proposed that describes the conditions of preferability of quadrupling at transistor level.

1. GOST 27.002-2015. Dependability in technics. Terms and definitions. Moscow: Standartinform; 2016 [in Russian].

2. Ramaswamy S, Rockett L, Patel D et al. A Radiation Hardened Reconfigurable FPGA, <https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/57f8/ff540360eadceafc062797b7a01065f6f9cc.pdf>, 2018 [accessed 30.03.2018].

3. Borisov Yul. О vybore arkhitektury otkazoustoychivykh vychislitelnykh kompleksov dlya kosmicheskikh apparatov [On the selection of the architecture of failsafe computer systems for spacecraft]. Dependability 2004;2(21):46-51 [inRussian].

4. Schabe H, Shubinsky IB. Limit reliability of structural redundancy. Dependability 2016;16(1):9-13.

5. Carl Carmichael. Triple Module Redundancy Design Techniques for Virtex FPGAs, <https://www.xilinx.com/support/documentation/applicationnotes/xapp197.pdf>, 2018 [accessed 30.03.2018].

6. Shubinsky IB. Nadiozhnie otkazoustoychivie iirformatsionnie sistemy. Metody sinteza [Dependable failsafe information systems. Synthesis methods]. Moscow: Dependability Jonmal; 2016 [inRussian]. ISBN 978-5-75720399-7.

7. VasilievNP, Shubinsky IB. Analiticheskayaotsenka veroiatnosti ouspeshnoy adaptatsii к otkazam modulnykh vychislitelnykh sistem s mnogourovnevoy aktivnoy zashchitoy [Analytical evaluation of the probability of successful adaptation to failures of modular computer systems with multilevel active protection]. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Priborostroenie. 1994;37(3-4):47 [inRussian].

8. Tarasov AA. Minimizatsiya vremeni funktsionalnoy rekonfiguratsii raspredeleimoy otkazoustoychivoy sistemy [Minimizing the time of functional reconfiguration of a distributed failsafe system]. Dependability 2010;2(37):2429 [inRussian].

9. Tyurin SF. Moving redundancy of tolerant elements. DependabiUty 2017;17(1):17-21.

10. WeibuU W. A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. Journal of Applied Mechanics, Transactions of ASME 1951;18:293-297.

11. Mead CA, Conway L. Introduction to VLSI Systems, <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234388249_Introduction_to_VLSI_systems>, 2018 [accessed 30.03.2018].