sustainНадежностьDependability1729-26462500-3909RAMS Journal Limited liability company10.21683/1729-2646-2015-0-3-73-86sustain-98Research ArticleФУНКЦИОНАЛЬНАЯ БЕЗОПАСНОСТЬ. ТЕОРИЯ И ПРАКТИКАFUNCTIONAL SAFETY. THE THEORY AND PRACTICEПРИНЦИП ПОСТРОЕНИЯ МАТРИЦ РИСКОВGUIDELINES FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A RISK MATRIXНовожиловЕ. О.NovozhilovE. O.

кандидат технических наук, начальник отдела Отделения управления рисками сложных технических систем

PhD Engineering, Chief of Division for Risk Management of Complex Technical Systems

eo.novozhilov@vniias.ruОАО «НИИАС»РоссияJSC «NIIAS»Russian Federation201506072016037386Copyright © Новожилов Е.О., 20162016Новожилов Е.О.Novozhilov E.O.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.dependability.ru/jour/article/view/98

Настоящая статья посвящена проблеме обеспечения точности представления результатов матриц рисков. Выявлены основные аспекты, влияющие на погрешность представления результатов матрицы рисков, на частном примере показано построение матрицы с минимальной для заданных условий погрешностью, обозначены направления дальнейших исследований.

The paper deals with the issue of selecting parameters that secure the construction of a risk matrix. Main aspects affecting the error of presentation of risk matrix results are identified. The construction of a risk matrix with minimum error for given conditions is shown by means of a particular example. Directions for further research are outlined.

рискматрица рисковпогрешность оценки рискачастота нежелательного событияразмер последствий нежелательного событияriskrisk matrixrisk estimation errorundesirable event frequencyseverity of consequences of an undesirable eventReferencesГОСТ Р 54505-2011 Безопасность функциональная. Управление рисками на железнодорожном транспорте.GOST R 54505-2011 Functional safety. Risk management on railway transport.Pickering A.,Cowley S.P. Risk Matrices: implied accuracy and false assumptions // Journal of Health & Safety Research & Practice. - Volume 2, issue 1. October, 2010.Pickering A., Cowley S.P. Risk Matrices: implied accuracy and false assumptions // Journal of Health & Safety Research & Practice. – Volume 2, issue 1. October, 2010.Cox L. A. Jr., Huber W. Optimal design of qualitative risk matrices to classify binary quantitative risks [abstract] // Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Society of Risk Analysis. Boston, December 7-10, 2008.Cox L. A. Jr., Huber W. Optimal design of qualitative risk matrices to classify binary quantitative risks [abstract] // Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Society of Risk Analysis. Boston, December 7-10, 2008.Clemens P.L. Working with the risk assessment matrix (lecture notes). 2nd edition. Tullahoma, TN: Sverdrup Technology, Inc., 1993.Clemens P.L. Working with the risk assessment matrix (lecture notes). 2nd edition. Tullahoma, TN: Sverdrup Technology, Inc., 1993.A risk matrix for risk managers. - The National Patient Safety Agency. London, January, 2008.A risk matrix for risk managers. – The National Patient Safety Agency. London, January, 2008.Risk assessment in audit planning. A guide for auditors on how best to assess risks when planning audit work // Internal Audit Community of Practice. http://www.pempal.org/data/upload/files/2014/09/rap_guide_eng.pdf.Risk assessment in audit planning. A guide for auditors on how best to assess risks when planning audit work // Internal Audit Community of Practice. http://www.pempal.org/data/upload/files/2014/09/rap_guide_eng.pdf.L.Cox. Whats wrong with risk matrices? Risk analysis. Vol. 28. №2, 2008. Pp. 497-511.L.Cox. Whats wrong with risk matrices? Risk analysis. Vol. 28. №2, 2008. Pp. 497‑511.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.